Major Research Areas
Molecular Biology

To understand the significance of the genetic interaction between Topo IV and the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme (Pol III HE) described in the overview, we isolated a mutant allele of dnaX, dnaXE145A, that failed to act as a high-copy suppressor of the conditional lethal phenotype of parE. Cells that carried this mutant allele in place of wild type dnaX filamented extensively and displayed a par-like chromosome phenotype, indicating that chromosome segregation was not executed properly in the absence of the interaction between Topo IV and the Pol III HE. To understand the molecular basis underlying this phenotype, we investigated the location of Topo IV and the Pol III HE in the cell. We found that in wild type cells, as had been suggested by the studies of other labs, the subunits of the Pol III HE were found in stationary replication factories in the center of the cell. Surprisingly, however, the subunits of Topo IV were found in distinct subcellular locations. ParC was associated with the replication factory; whereas ParE was found in the DNA-free spaces of the cell (Figure 10).

Figure 10
Figure 10 Immunofluorescent localization of ParC and ParE in E. coli. ParC localizes in the same pattern as replication factories.
A, overlay of B,C, and D; B, anti-ParC antibody; C, FtsZ-GFP (marks the septal ring); D, DAPI stain (marks the DNA). ParE localizes to the DNA-free spaces of the cell. E, overlay of F and G; F, anti-ParE antibody; G, DAPI.

Remarkably, specific localization of ParC to the replication factory was disrupted in dnaXE145A mutant cells. Here, ParC was found distributed on the nucleoid. These findings suggested that in wild type cells, Topo IV activity was manifest only late in the cell cycle, after the replication factory had disassembled and ParC was released so that it could interact with ParE; and that this temporal and spatial regulation was required for proper and efficient daughter chromosome segregation.

Figure 11
Figure 11 Topoisomerase IV acts at the end of the cell cycle.
A, the cell-killing assay; B, TUNEL staining, as described in the text.

To prove this model, we developed assays to assess the location of both DNA gyrase and Topo IV on the nucleoid in vivo (Figure 11). Quinolone-induced, DNA gyrase-, or Topo IV-mediated cell killing as a function of the cell cycle was measured to determine when gyrase and Topo IV activity was manifest. An isogenic pair of strains was used where the GyrA subunit of DNA gyrase was either sensitive or resistant to the quinolone norfloxacin, and that also carried a temperature-sensitive dnaC mutation that allowed synchronization of cell growth by a triple temperature-shift procedure. Formation of quinolone-induced double-strand breaks correlates with the cytotoxicity of these drugs and has been shown to occur when the replication fork encounters the frozen topoisomerase-quinolone-DNA complex. When gyrase was sensitive to norfloxacin, cell killing was co-incident with the onset of replication, consistent with random positioning of gyrase on the DNA.

On the other hand, when gyrase was resistant to norfloxacin, cell killing occurred only late in the cell cycle, implying that Topo IV was restricted from access to the DNA until the end of the replication cycle. This interpretation was supported by the use of TUNEL to label all quinolone-mediated, SDS-induced, double-strand breaks on the nucleoid across the cell cycle. This technique should measure residence of any gyrase or Topo IV molecule on the DNA. The results were in complete agreement with the cell-killing experiments and showed that Topo IV activity was concentrated on the edge of the nucleoid proximal that was proximal to the septum.

We suggest that the temporal regulation affected by the sequestration of the Topo IV subunits from one another, coupled with the cell cycle-dependent release of ParC from the replication factory, is intended to focus Topo IV activity in rapidly growing cells to the correct pair of chromosomes in the cell -- those whose topological linkage must be eliminated in order for the cell to divide successfully. In cells that are growing slowly, the replication period for any particular chromosome is shorter than that of the complete cell cycle. Thus, the parental chromosome replicates, the daughters are partitioned, and the cells divide. Chromosome content does not exceed 2 per cell. Two conditions, therefore, obtain with respect to daughter chromosome decatenation: Topo IV bound anywhere on either of the daughter chromosomes can affect efficient decatenation, and thus uniformly dispersed Topo IV can effectively find the proper substrate, i.e., the chromosomes that have to be separated to allow subsequent cytokinesis.

Rapidly growing cells have more than one replicating chromosome and thus have multiple pairs of daughter chromosomes. Yet, successful cell division requires the decatenation of a particular pair of daughter chromosomes. Under conditions of rapid growth, we suggest that decatenation by uniformly dispersed Topo IV of the separating pair of chromosomes would be inefficient because by binding to all the other DNA in the cell, the enzyme is effectively occupied elsewhere. By temporally regulating Topo IV activity, the cell ensures that a bolus of Topo IV activity is delivered where it is needed -- to the chromosome pair that is clearing the division plane. As described in the next section, Topo IV activity is likely to be retained in the center of the cell because of an interaction between ParC and the septal ring protein FtsK.

PrintEmail This Page