Major Research Areas
Molecular Pharmacology & Chemistry

The overall goals of the Minimally Invasive Surgery section at Memorial Sloan-Kettering are to develop and refine the laparoscopic surgical approach to genitourinary malignancies in order to define the optimal role of the laparoscopic compared with the open approach, with the endpoint being to maintain or improve the efficacy of open surgery while substantially reducing perioperative and long-term morbidity, and increasing the acceptability of surgical removal and reconstruction in patients with these cancers.

Prostate Cancer

The ultimate goal of the surgical treatment of prostate cancer is the complete removal of the cancer located in the gland with the lowest perioperative morbidity (in terms of pain, blood loss, time in the hospital, and time lost from normal activities) and the absence of functional sequelae (in terms of urinary continence and sexual potency).

Therefore, the immediate research goals with respect to prostate cancer are to:

  • Tailor the surgical technique to the individual patient and to his particular cancer. Taking advantage of the expertise at Memorial Sloan-Kettering in radiological imaging (especially endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopy), the ease of multiple mapping biopsies in the urological ultrasound laboratory, and the facility for nomogram, we will explore optimal techniques for identifying the location and extent of cancer in each patient and adapting the laparoscopic operation appropriately. Using medical informatics tools, such as nomograms and decision analysis models, we will investigate the optimal role and extent of lymph node dissection, as well as the indications for partial or total resection of neurovascular bundles.
  • Compare outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with those after other forms of treatment for localized prostate cancer. We have a unique opportunity at Memorial Sloan-Kettering to compare outcomes in large numbers of patients using modern comprehensive questionnaires to assess patient-reported quality-of-life results after each of the major forms of therapy, including laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, external beam irradiation therapy, as well as expectant management ("watchful waiting"). Our goal will be to gain objective information that will lead to improved surgical techniques and better outcomes, and to provide objective data about the frequency and severity of complications that will help us, in collaboration with investigators in medical informatics, to construct decision-analysis models to facilitate patient decision-making. No other center will have the level of expertise in all of these approaches that would allow comparisons of state-of-the-art techniques in each discipline.
  • Develop and test new instruments in laboratory animal experiments, to improve visibility and facilitate anatomically precise resection of the prostate with minimal damage to surrounding tissue. The focus of development will include nonrobotic stereotactic vision cameras and laparoscopic doppler probes to identify the arterial component of the neurovascular bundles responsible for erectile function. With improvements of instruments, the quality of surgery can improve and the ease of learning can diminish so that these techniques can be adapted more readily by surgeons.
  • Evaluate the role of the robotic assistance in laparoscopic surgery, particularly for specific surgical steps necessitating extremely accurate gestures, such as interposition of nerve grafts of the cavernosal nerve in case of neurovascular bundle resection for extensive tumor in potent patients.

Kidney Tumors

Laparoscopy is a surgical approach that is well developed for other genitourinary cancers, especially cancers of the kidney and upper urinary tract. In this framework, the research goals of the Minimally Invasive Surgery section are to:

  • Develop and use a comprehensive validated patient self-reported quality-of-life questionnaire to compare, in collaboration with informatics experts and open surgeons in the Department of Urology, outcomes after laparoscopic, after open radical nephrectomy, and after nephroureterectomy.
  • Assess the long-term efficacy of laparoscopic compared with open renal surgery, especially with respect to the indications for total versus partial nephrectomy. Together with experts in imaging and pathology and medical informatics, we can explore perioperative predictors that will help select the most appropriate candidates for each surgical approach.
  • Develop improved techniques for partial nephrectomy for cancers of the kidney, and evaluate the functional risk of transient renal ischemia.
  • Evaluate the indications and the role of ablative techniques (cryotherapy, radiofrequency waves) for small renal tumors in comparison with the other techniques for partial nephrectomy for cancers.

This is a multi-cooperative project, involving the Departments of Radiology and Pathology.

Testis Tumors

We have the project to evaluate the role of the laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for a well-designed subset of patients with testis cancer.

  • Evaluation of the outcomes after laparoscopic and after open radical retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.
  • Assess the long-term efficacy of laparoscopic compared with that of open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection.

We aim to explore perioperative predictors that will help select the most appropriate candidates for each surgical approach.


Bookmark and SharePrintEmail This Page