Quality of Breast Cancer Surgery Not Easily Measured

By Eva Kiesler

on Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Pictured: Monica Morrow Monica Morrow, Breast Surgical Service Chief

Breast Surgical Service Chief Monica Morrow provides perspective on assessing the quality of surgical breast cancer treatment in an editorial in the February 1 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

About one in four women who have been treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer eventually have a second round of surgery, called reexcision, to remove additional tissue.

In a study published in the February 1 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), researchers suggest that monitoring how often such reexcision procedures are performed at different hospitals or by individual surgeons might be a way to assess the quality of surgical treatment these women receive.

But according to breast surgeon Monica Morrow, who heads Memorial Sloan Kettering’s Breast Surgical Service, reexcision rates do not offer a reliable measure of surgical performance.

In an editorial accompanying the JAMA study, Dr. Morrow and Stephen M. Katz, a professor at the University of Michigan, caution that reexcision rates can be influenced by many factors other than the quality of breast-conserving surgical procedures.

“For instance, some surgeons may offer BCS only to patients with tumors of 1 cm or less in size, despite definitive evidence that BCS is equally effective for tumors up to 4 cm,” the authors write. “These surgeons’ reexcision rates will be low because small tumors are easy to remove, but the low reexcision rate is the result of many unnecessary initial mastectomies. Similarly, surgeons who remove very large amounts of normal breast tissue during lumpectomy will have low reexcision rates, but poor cosmetic outcomes.”

Dr. Morrow says that while new methods to monitor the quality of breast cancer surgery are needed, the development of such tools will require extensive research and evaluation.

The editorial notes that “any proposed quality measures must be evidence based and relevant to the current understanding of breast cancer biology” in order to be useful to clinicians and beneficial to patients.

In a February 1 New York Times story (“Breast Cancer Surgery Rules Called Unclear”), Dr. Morrow provides further perspective on the study and its implications.



Add new comment

Your email address is kept private and will not be shown publicly.