Growing up, Philipp Niethammer learned from his mother to never scratch his moles.
“I am not sure I knew what might happen if I scratched,” says the Sloan Kettering Institute cell biologist. “But I knew it was bad, so I didn’t do it.”
That old warning resurfaced in Dr. Niethammer’s mind not too long ago when he read a research article describing how repeated injury to the tail fin of a zebrafish could cause tumors to develop.
Like humans, zebrafish are prone to getting melanoma, a type of skin cancer. The study found that injuring the fish’s tail fin every couple of weeks for several months greatly increased the rate of cancer formation in that spot.
Intrigued by the finding, Dr. Niethammer wrote a commentary on the paper, extrapolating what the results might mean for humans. He called it “Do not scratch that mole!”
More and more, scientists are coming to understand that wounds and cancer have a lot in common.
“I figured other people had been warned by their parents like I was, and might be interested in the findings,” he says.
Scratching moles isn’t a generally recognized way that skin cancer develops. And indeed, Dr. Niethammer stresses that the fish study should not cause people to worry unnecessarily. But there likely is a grain of truth in the old advice, he says.
Scratching can cause microscopic injuries, or even outright wounds. And more and more, scientists are coming to understand that wounds and cancer have a lot in common. The inflammation that results from an injury — and even the healing process itself — can actually promote cancer.
Technically speaking, a mole is collection of cells called melanocytes. These are the cells in skin that make melanin, the pigment that creates a suntan, determines skin tone, and gives moles their color.
Moles aren’t cancer, but they’re not completely normal either. Pretty much all of the melanocytes in a mole have a mutation in a cancer-related gene called BRAF that causes them to grow and multiply. But the vast majority do not turn into cancer; they simply go to sleep, a state called quiescence.
What makes a small fraction of moles become cancerous is not known, but it is an active area of research. One hypothesis is that it’s not so much the genetic mutations a mole has but what the surrounding tissue looks like — for example, whether it is irritated or inflamed.
“There is an increasing amount of evidence that inflammation can convert a group of abnormal cells into a full-blown tumor,” says Richard White, a physician-scientist in the Cancer Biology and Genetics Program at SKI and an expert in melanocytes and melanoma. “Some people think that inflammation is essential for that to occur.”
Like Dr. Niethammer, Dr. White studies these and related issues in zebrafish. These small freshwater fish have some useful features when it comes to studying cancer. For one, they’re see-through, so researchers can watch what’s happening under the skin without cutting them open. For another, their immune system is a lot like that of humans, so lessons learned in one may apply to the other.
A study that Dr. White and colleagues published last year lends support to the idea that the area surrounding a cancer cell can influence its fate.
“We asked, ‘What if you took the exact same tumor cell and put it in two different environments, one that was just a normal fish and one in which we had deleted a specific environmental factor?’ ”
“In the normal fish, the tumor just exploded and metastasized,” he says. “In the animal with the altered environment, no tumors developed.”Back to top
Triggers for Cancer Growth
That inflammation can play a role in cancer is not a new idea. Scientists have known for some time that chronic inflammation — inflammation that does not go away for months or years — is a major risk factor for cancer. It’s thought to contribute to colon cancer and types of gastric cancer, for example. (In both of those cases, inflammation results from the immune system attacking certain microbes.)
Whether short-term inflammation can promote cancer as well is still an open question. But given the similarities between a healing wound and a growing cancer, it’s not so far-fetched.
Like wounds, growing cancers attract immune cells that promote the process of tissue repair after damage. Rather than stop the cancer’s growth, these immune cells fuel it. Scientists even sometimes refer to cancers as “wounds that do not heal.”
“Tissue damage, perhaps in part through inflammation, sends a signal for cells to divide and regenerate the damaged area,” Dr. Niethammer says. “Could a similar signal trigger a cancer cell to start dividing? It’s possible.”
In the study that prompted Dr. Niethammer’s commentary, the researchers repeatedly cut the same part of the fish’s tail for months.
“That’s not a very realistic scenario,” Dr. Niethammer says. “A person would not likely cut themselves in the same place over and over again.”
But there are other cases suggesting that even short-term inflammation can be the spark that ignites a flame. Some older research studies point in this direction. And in May 2018, a scientific paper published in the journal Science Translational Medicine reignited the debate. That study, led by Robert Weinberg at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, found that a surgical wound could cause dormant breast cancer cells in mice to wake up and start to grow and spread.
Dr. Niethammer doesn’t know of any documented cases in which a person scratching a mole led to cancer. It’s more a theoretical possibility than a proven scenario.
But he isn’t about to start scratching. “It’s just common sense,” he says. “A mole is already something that is a bit odd. Why do anything to make it odder?”Back to top