1. Jemal A, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:10-30.68:208-12. [PubMed Abstract]
2. Duffy SW, et al. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer. 2002;95:458-69. [PubMed Abstract]
3. Thomas DB, et al. Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1445-57. [PubMed Abstract]
4. Semiglazov VF, et al. [Results of a prospective randomized investigation [Russia (St Petersburg)/WHO] to evaluate the significance of self-examination for the early detection of breast cancer]. Vopr Onkol. 2003;49:434-41. [PubMed Abstract]
5. Ellman R, et al. Breast self-examination programs in the trail of early detection of breast caner: ten year findings. Br J Cancer. 1993. [PubMed Abstract]
6. Smith RA, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53:141-69. [PubMed Abstract]
7. Humphrey LL, et al. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:347-60. [PubMed Abstract]
8. Berry DA, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1784-92. [PubMed Abstract]
9. Osen O, Gotzsche PC. Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 2001;358:1340-2. [PubMed Abstract]
10. Dershaw DD. Mammographic screening of the high-risk woman. Am J Surg. 2000;180:288-9. [PubMed Abstract]
11. Dershaw DD, Yahalom J, Petrek JA. Breast carcinoma in women previously treated for Hodgkin disease: mammographic evaluation. Radiology. 1992;184:421-3. [PubMed Abstract]
12. Pisano ED, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1773-83. [PubMed Abstract]
13. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002;225:165-75. [PubMed Abstract]
14. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US—diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology. 1998;207:191-9. [PubMed Abstract]
15. Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001;221:641-9. [PubMed Abstract]
16. Buchberger W, et al. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:921-7. [PubMed Abstract]
17. SOCIETY of Imaging Position Paper - Screening Breast Sonography in Dense Breasts. 2005.
18. Kriege M, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:427-37. [PubMed Abstract]
19. Leach MO, et al. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicenter cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet. 2005;365:1769-78. [PubMed Abstract]
20. Kuhl CK, Kuhn W, Schild H. Management of women at high risk for breast cancer: New imaging beyond mammography. Breast. 2005;14:480-6. [PubMed Abstract]
21. Warner E, Causer PA. MRI surveillance for hereditary breast-cancer risk. Lancet. 2005;365:1747-9. [PubMed Abstract]
22. CH L. Current status of MRI screening for breast cancer in Radiological Society of North America. Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology: Breast Imaging 2005.
23. Menell JH, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Brogi E, Liberman L. Determination of presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and MRI. Breast J, in press. [PubMed Abstract]