Decoder

On Cancer: What Is Tumor Heterogeneity?

By Eva Kiesler, PhD, Science Writer/Editor  |  Wednesday, July 2, 2014
Pictured: Gum ball machines Until recently, the cells within a tumor were thought to be similar to one another at any given stage of the cancer, like the white gumballs in the machine on the left. But scientists are finding that a person's tumor cells can be highly diverse. This could mean that a biopsy may capture only a fraction of tumor cells that are not representative of the whole tumor, like a ball ejected at random from the machine on the right.

Every person’s cancer develops and grows in its own way and is unique in terms of what therapies it’s sensitive to. At Memorial Sloan Kettering and at other research centers around the world, the push is on to characterize the molecular variations between tumors — known as inter-tumor heterogeneity — and offer individualized treatments to more patients. That alone is a massive task.

And yet, according to some scientists, understanding how one person’s tumor differs from another’s may not be enough. Among those researchers is Memorial Sloan Kettering biologist Scott W. Lowe, who chairs the Cancer Biology and Genetics Program and the Geoffrey Beene Cancer Research Center. He thinks the next big quest in cancer science will be to peer ever more deeply into the genetics and biology of individual patients’ diseases and explore variations between subpopulations of tumor cells.

“We are increasingly becoming aware of the problem of intra-tumor heterogeneity, the fact that one person’s tumor cells can vary depending on where in the body they are located,” he says. “Even within the same tumor from the same patient, tumor cells might be subtly or even dramatically different. And there can be very important implications of this type of heterogeneity.”

Why It Matters

One implication is that more-sophisticated tools will be needed to characterize patients’ cancers and guide their treatment. Pathological examination of tumors often relies on needle biopsy, a procedure in which small samples of cells are extracted from a tumor for analysis. However, if doctors are dealing with a highly heterogeneous cancer, the tiny fraction of cells in the biopsy may not be representative of the entire tumor mass — which means important disease features might be missed.

“A potentially effective therapy could be overlooked because the indicator for that drug [such as a specific gene mutation] wasn’t found in the biopsy,” Dr. Lowe explains. “Or conversely, the wrong drug might be chosen if a biopsy reveals the presence of an indicator that isn’t actually that prevalent in the tumor.”

Intra-tumor heterogeneity may also explain, at least in part, why some patients who initially respond well to a cancer drug eventually relapse, often with new tumors that no longer respond to the therapy. The higher the diversity of cells within a tumor, the bigger the risk that an occasional cell might be able to adapt to the type of stress a drug imposes. If that cell then goes on to multiply and seed new cancer growth, it can potentially produce a drug-resistant tumor.

A Murky Field

Let’s pause for a bit and think about the staggering complexity of tumors. Given that every person’s cancer is different and that one person’s disease in itself can be a microcosm of cancer subtypes, it’s no wonder many tumors remain challenging to control even after decades of intensive research.

“What we’re learning is a bit daunting, in a sense,” Dr. Lowe says. “We’ve known for a long time that there are variances within tumors, but the depth of intra-tumor heterogeneity didn’t become apparent until recently when new technologies became available that allow us to really narrow in on single tumor cells and study their gene changes.”

Still, he remains optimistic. “Now that there is increasing awareness of the problem, and we are building the tools and resources to confront it, there will be enormous opportunity to finally get at some of the most pressing issues of cancer — like understanding why some drugs fail and what we can do to prevent it.”

New Ideas for Therapy

In fact, research in Dr. Lowe’s lab has already uncovered new aspects of intra-tumor heterogeneity that potentially could inform treatment. For example, many studies of the problem have focused on identifying genetic differences between a person’s tumor cells. But in a recent report in Nature, Dr. Lowe and his co-workers showed that the heterogeneity is not always genetic.

Working in mouse models of T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), an often aggressive type of blood cancer, the researchers found that tumor cells, even genetically identical ones, may behave differently depending on where in the body they are located. This is because the cells’ ability to grow and survive is influenced by the tissue microenvironment — the noncancerous tissues, cells, and molecules that exist close to the tumor.

The findings could have implications for how T cell ALL tumors in different body sites respond to PI3-kinase inhibitors, a new class of drugs entering clinical trials for the disease. “It’s conceivable that these drugs might be effective against tumors in some body sites but not others, depending on differences in the local environment,” Dr. Lowe notes.

The good news, he adds, is that a number of other drugs currently in development work by targeting cells or molecules in a tumor’s surroundings, preventing these factors from supporting tumor growth. Scientists hope it will be possible to eradicate some difficult-to-treat tumors in the future by combining drugs such as PI3-kinase inhibitors, which act on tumor cells, with drugs that work on the tumor microenvironment.

But Dr. Lowe emphasizes that a lot more research is needed. “There’s so much we still don’t know about the biology of tumors and their microenvironment,” he says, “and we are only beginning to understand the clinical implications of tumor heterogeneity and how to deal with them.”

Comments

Simply put: This is new to me and I'm learning more promptly. I'm curious as to if Cancer Treatment Centers of America is as great as the rumors, also, is Memorial Sloan Ketting ? We are dealing with colon/rectal cancer.

Frank, thank you for reaching out. Memorial Sloan Kettering is a leader in the treatment of all cancers, including colon and rectal cancer.

Here is information about the advantages of being treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering:

http://www.mskcc.org/cancer-care/hospital-information/why-msk-care

In addition, here is information specifically about the treatment of colorectal cancer at Memorial Sloan Kettering:

http://www.mskcc.org/cancer-care/adult/colorectal

If you would like to make an appointment with a Memorial Sloan Kettering physician, please call our Physician Referral Service at 800-525-2225 or go to http://www.mskcc.org/cancer-care/appointment. Thanks for your comment.

Tumor heterogeneity was known 35 years ago. I worked in a research lab that was trying to do drug sensitivity testing on patients tumors. I could homogenous a sample of the tumor, separate it into 3 parts and test against a panel of drugs. Each result was different. We would say the test was more reliable in noting which drugs would NOT work, rather than which ones would. This heterogeneity was also found in established tumor cell lines. Cells from an established cell line would be injected into a nude mouse. The resulting tumor was then excised and homogenized, split into 3 parts and set up against a panel of drugs. Once again 3 different results. We would have 1 tech work with all 3 portions to remove and variation of technique by different techs.

I would add that the mouse tumor from the cell line was taken from a single subcutaneous site.

What is your survival rate for Ovarian Cancer? Have you developed any more recent protocols other than the usual chemotherapy with their dangerous poisonous results? I saw a recent news story about Sloan Kettering's development of a method whereby cancer cells are removed from a person's body and later injected into the same body where they involve the body's immune system to fight the cancer. Is this a possible method in fighting ovarian cancer?

Dear Phillis, thanks very much for your comment. We will have to get back to you on your question about survival data. But in terms of treatment, you can read more about all of our treatment options for ovarian cancer, including investigational approaches such as immune therapy, on this page of our website: http://www.mskcc.org/cancer-care/adult/ovarian/treatment. And here is a listing of all our clinical trials for ovarian cancer: http://www.mskcc.org/cancer-care/adult/ovarian/clinical-trials

Dear Phillis, we will e-mail you with some info about survival data. Thanks again.

What is your knowledge on how to treat stage 4 cervical cancer that metastised(sp) only to the liver after two rounds of chemo - a radical hysterectomy was performed before the first round but the cancer appeared on the liver so a second round was done - appears to have grown on the liver but no where else - all organ functions test normal

Dear Paul, we aren't able to offer personal medical advice on our blog. If you or a loved one would like to make an appointment with one of our experts to discuss possible treatment options, please call our Physician Referral Service at 800-225-2225. You may be interested in reading more about our approach to treating cervical cancer, and our clinical trials, here: http://www.mskcc.org/cancer-care/adult/cervical
Thank you for your comment.

Add a Comment

We welcome your questions and comments. Because this is a public forum, please do not include contact information or other personal details. Also, keep in mind that while we can provide general information and resources, we cannot offer personal medical advice. To make an appointment with one of our experts, contact our Physician Referral Service at 800-525-2225 or online.
Your e-mail address is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options